Rozdíly

Zde můžete vidět rozdíly mezi vybranou verzí a aktuální verzí dané stránky.

Odkaz na výstup diff

Obě strany předchozí revize Předchozí verze
en:koncentrace_dodavatelu [2019/09/30 11:42]
Tomáš Ducháček [How do we evaluate this?]
en:koncentrace_dodavatelu [2019/09/30 11:45] (aktuální)
Tomáš Ducháček [Who may be discriminated by this indicator?]
Řádek 34: Řádek 34:
 This indicator puts minor contracting authorities that award fewer contracts at a disadvantage,​ because they have a more limited range of bidders. It should therefore be used only for the benchmarking of comparably sized contracting authorities. This indicator puts minor contracting authorities that award fewer contracts at a disadvantage,​ because they have a more limited range of bidders. It should therefore be used only for the benchmarking of comparably sized contracting authorities.
  
-This indicator may also discriminate against an authority that awarded a large investment contract whose financial value exceeded 50% of the value of all its public contracts in the period (e.g. a contract for a waste water treatment plant in a small municipality),​ if this contract was for a project that could not be split into smaller lots. Authorities whose previous management left a dubious legacy, having allowed a supplier to establish an irreplaceable position (so called vendor lock-in, see above) would also be unjustly penalized by this indicator, as would authorities who award contracts several times to the same supplier because the supplier'​s bids are genuinely of unmatched quality.+Authorities whose previous management left a dubious legacy, having allowed a supplier to establish an irreplaceable position (so called vendor lock-in, see above) would also be unjustly penalized by this indicator, as would authorities who award contracts several times to the same supplier because the supplier'​s bids are genuinely of unmatched quality.
  
  
  • en/koncentrace_dodavatelu.txt
  • Poslední úprava: 2019/09/30 11:45
  • autor: Tomáš Ducháček